Undercover Lawyer Forum » Introduction

Employee Manuals

(59 posts)
  • Started 2 months ago by bleeb
  • Latest reply from littlelulu
  1. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    I work for a company that does not have an employee manual - because it is "easier" for them legally if they do not have one! Three times since starting I have been told that I am violating the "dress code" but when have asked to see the dress code in the employee manual I received an email indicating what was acceptable attire.

    Mind you that this is a VERY casual company - people dress in ripped jeans, tank tops, etc. Each time it is one particular person who tells me that I am offending the dress code, and she emails my manager - who knew nothing of a dress code when he hired me. One day she actually walked by our staff meeting and looked at my shoes, then complained to my manager that they were not appropriate.

    Also - there are other people in the company/office that wear the exact same things, but are not singled out. Is this some form of harrassment? I also requested from my manager to drop down to 32 hours per week. With the blessing of his boss and the president I was told yes and that I could keep my benefits. Once the "Fashion Police" woman found out - she put a halt to it stating that I had to work 40 hours to receive any benefits.

    I've asked for copies of the SPD but nothing in there states the actual number of hours required to receive benefits. I specifically requested this information and was told it was against company policy to supply this to employees - WHAT??

    The department of labor told me it is federal law to supply this information - and I have passed that on to the HR person - but have not received any response. Any advice as to what my rights are would be greatly appreciated! I feel like I have gone back into the dark ages!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  2. littlelulu

    Super Moderator
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 2914

    Welcome to the forum Bleeb.

    Sounds like where I used to work BUT we had written workplace rules. One supervisor and the administrator does NOT like jeans and had the sups start writing into peoples evaluations how they dressed. WELL, the state of Washington does NOT have a dress code UNLESS you work for an agency that requires a uniform like the State Patrol, prisons, etc. So, they union actually came in and said that they WOULD file a grievance because the MEN in the office normal attire was JEANS so it was gender discrimination to write this into the womens evals and not the mens............Guess What? Those evals in question were rewritten and the comments about attire were deleted....

    I am not sure HOW they can tell you that you are not dressing properly if there is NO PLACE to go to see the rules in WRITING. OnYourSide, your expert comments in this area would be GREATLY appreciated.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  3. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Hi, Bleeb -
    I'm an HR professional with 20+ years of experience, so I think I can answer your questions.

    With regard to your employer not having an employee manual because it's "easier" for them legally not to have one, I can tell you that the exact opposite is probably true! They probably lose every Unemployment case they have, and they would certainly lose any
    discrimination or harassment case if they don't have even the most basic of procedures laid out for employees to follow to report something. They're running around naked and it's not very smart! Not having a defined dress code is the LEAST of their worries! I wouldn't bother too much about the fashion police. What I'd do is send an email to the boss, asking for clarification. Say something like "So-and-so informs me that blank, blank and blank aren't acceptable within the guidelines of COMPANY's dress code. However, because COMPANY has no published dress code guidelines, employees are understandably put in the uncomfortable position of being judged on an individual basis. I have observed that female employees are more often judged as "not conforming" to the unwritten dress code. I respectfully request that COMPANY's dress code be defined and distributed to all employees so that it may be consistently applied going forward.
    Sincerely,
    You"

    Regarding the health insurance benefits: the DOL is correct (no surprise!) that your employer is required by law to have and provide to each employee an SPD (Summary Plan Description). Here's a link to the DOL's handy Fact Sheet on SPDs. Perhaps your HR person would react more favorably if you said, "Listen, I really hate to have to get the Department of Labor involved, because I understand there are some HEFTY FINES for companies that don't follow the law by providing the SPDs to their employees as required. So I'm sure you know who to contact to get the SPDs for us and make sure that all of our employees - including me - receive one within the next 10 days so that a call to the DOL isn't necessary." Even the GREENEST HR person won't ignore a veiled threat to bring the federal government down on their head! heeheehee Watch 'em run!!!

    http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/fserisa.html

    Here's the text of the DOL's Fact Sheet on SPDs:

    Fact Sheet: Workers’ Right To Health Plan Information

    The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs approximately 2.5 million health benefit plans sponsored by private sector employers nationwide. These plans provide a wide range of medical, surgical, hospital and other health care benefits to some 137 million Americans.

    Under ERISA, workers and their families are entitled to receive a summary plan description (SPD). The SPD is the primary document that gives information about the plan, what benefits are available under the plan, the rights of participant and beneficiaries under the plan, and how the plan works.

    Among other information, the SPD of health plans must describe:

    Cost-sharing provisions, including premiums, deductibles, coinsurance and copayment amounts for which the participant or beneficiary will be responsible

    Annual or lifetime caps or other limits on benefits under the plan

    The extent to which preventive services are covered under the plan

    Whether, and under what circumstances, existing and new drugs are covered under the plan

    Whether, and under what circumstances, coverage is provided for medical tests, devices and procedures

    Provisions governing the use of network providers, the composition of provider networks and whether, and under what circumstances, coverage is provided for out-of-network services

    Conditions or limits on the selection of primary care providers or providers of specialty medical care

    Conditions or limits applicable to obtaining emergency medical care

    Provisions requiring preauthorizations or utilization review as a condition to obtaining a benefit or service under the plan

    The SPD must also explain how plan benefits may be obtained and the process for appealing denied benefits.

    ERISA also requires that SPDs be updated periodically. Furthermore, ERISA requires disclosure of any material reduction in covered services or benefits to participants and beneficiaries generally within 60 days of the adoption of the change through either a revised SPD or a summary of material modification (SMM). Material changes that do not result in a reduction in covered services or benefits must be disclosed through an SMM or revised SPD not later than 210 days after the end of the plan year in which the change was adopted.

    The Department’s claims procedure regulation describes your right to get an answer from your health plan regarding your health benefit claim. The regulation protects you – providing for a timely response by describing the timeframes for a decision, providing for a fair process by describing the standards for a decision, and providing for meaningful disclosure by describing the notice and disclosure that you are entitled to receive from your plan. Look to the SPD for information on your health plan’s claims procedure.

    This fact sheet has been developed by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Washington, DC 20210. It will be made available in alternate formats upon request: Voice phone: 202.693.8664; TTY: 1.202.501.3911. In addition, the information in this fact sheet constitutes a small entity compliance guide for purposes of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  4. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    OnYourSide - thank you for your advice! I did in fact send out the email you suggested - and here is the reply: We provide the outline of our Dress Code ”guidelines” at the time the employee is hired. This would have been covered with you in a “verbal” orientation. We do not have a written document that covers this. I see by your email below that your Supervisor Ben C*****n has already covered the dress code with you.

    If you are uncertain as to what is considered acceptable regarding the Dress code, please feel free to come and visit with me and I will go over this with you once again.

    Is it legal for them to do this? Because there are other women who wear exactly what I was wearing when I was told I was violating the dress code.

    As far as the other issue with the eligibility classes - they have flat out refused to give me the information so I contacted the department of labor. Thanks for all your advice!!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  5. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    Sorry - I then sent her this reply:

    Actually a dress code was not mentioned when I was hired. It was only after I was hired that I was informed (by you in the lunchroom) there was some sort of dress code and that I was violating it – and my supervisor didn’t even know it existed and he’s been here 8 years! I would actually prefer to have it in writing, and provided to all employees to make sure that everyone is on the same page. I hope that won’t be a problem.

    And received this in return:

    We do not have a written document that covers this, as I stated in my first email.

    If this was not covered with you at the time of your hiring, I apologize. I am happy to know that it has now been covered with you.
    As I said in my earlier email, you are welcome to visit with me to discuss this issue at anytime.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  6. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    What a dweeb (this supposed HR person, not you, bleeb!). Okay, she doesn't want to put it in writing, but that doesn't prevent YOU from putting it in writing. It's not illegal for them to not have a written dress code, it's just stupid - waaaayyy stupid, because as you can see, the "I know it when I see it" Miss Fashion Police type of enforcement doesn't work. And she'll eventually step over the line and try to enforce her own dress code with someone who happens to be in a protected class when she's not enforcing it with someone else who's NOT in a protected class.

    Meet with Miss Fashion Police and ask her (kindly) to clarify the dress code policy for you, so that you don't unintentionally break it again. When you leave her little hidey-hole, go directly to your desk and send her the following email:

    "Dear Ms. HR:
    Thank you so much for the clarification of COMPANY's Dress Code Policy, which I understand is not in writing anywhere. Because I have never been informed in the past of the policy, and want to make sure going forward that I don't unintentionally break it, I thought it best to commit our conversation to writing. If I have misunderstood anything, I would appreciate your correcting me as soon as possible - in writing.

    My understanding of COMPANY's Dress Code Policy is now: blah, blah, blah, blah.

    Of course, it is my expectation that this policy will be enforced unilaterally for all employees, rather than a select few. Again, I appreciate so much the time you took out of your day to meet with me and look forward to more enjoyable conversations in the future.
    Sincerely,
    You"

    That should cause Little Miss Slimey to scurry back to her hidey-hole and stay put. If it doesn't, you'll squash her by keeping track of all the people who "break" the policy going forward and are and aren't disciplined - their genders, their ages, and their races. You will then file a complaint with the EEOC for gender, age, and/or racial discrimination. heeheehee

    Posted 2 months ago #
  7. littlelulu

    Super Moderator
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 2914

    Bleeb, I edited your supervisors name to protect you from someone doing a GOOGLE or other search and finding you on the forum.

    OnYourSide is 100% correct. One of the things I learned in a training the office sent me to about a year ago, "Crucial Conversations", is the NEED to paraphase back to the person you are talking to so you make sure you heard what they were saying to you correctly. This is such an EXCELLENT way to also get in "writing" (email form) the type of CRAP your bully boss is pulling on you since most of them do NOT realize they are verifying THEIR poor behavior/discrimination/bullying for any actions you might be planning to take against them. You talk to them in person, then you send them a "nice" email making it look like you are trying so hard to do what they want and paraphase what the conversation was about. THEN YOU HAVE THEM. Hope this makes sense. It does to me but what I think and how I say it sometimes are a bit hazy.......

    Posted 2 months ago #
  8. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    Thanks for covering my mistake! I noticed that after I posted! I did setup this meeting with her and also requested that my supervisor be there as well, to make sure we are all on the same page.

    I also have another question - totally related. The reason that I dropped to 32 hours from 40 is because I have a daughter with bipolar disorder. She has therapy appts once per week and sometimes more. Currently I cannot take her as I do not have enough vacation time, etc accrued. I can't take FMLA because I have not worked here a year. Does any of this help to put me in a protected class - because I can just see her trying to fire me next week after our meeting!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  9. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    bleeb,
    How close are you to having a year in at this company? And how many employees are there? And how old is your daughter?

    Posted 2 months ago #
  10. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    I've only been here since April 17th. There are a couple hundred employees and my daughter is 13.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  11. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Let me investigate a few things and I'll get back with you later today.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  12. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    bleeb,
    If I were you, I'd work 40 hours, and try to hang on until you've been there for a year. Then you'll be covered by FMLA. If the insurance policy requires that employees work 40 hours to be covered, nothing the president or your boss says can change that. Of course, you won't KNOW what the policy says until you get ahold of that SPD!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  13. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    Thanks for the information! I did have my meeting with Mrs. HR this morning about the dress code. It amazes me on condescending some people can be. She told me the reason they don't want to write it down is they want the "flexibility" of being able to announce that one day may be flip-flop day or another day a sweatshirt day. I told her fine - but that I expected to be treated equally along with the other employees and that I didn't appreciate being looked up and down - and she asked me if that offended me! So anyway, I took your advice and sent out the email above and will keep track of any "offenses" that I see. Is it age discrimination when the problem seems to be that she is older and has issues with "younger" women?

    Posted 2 months ago #
  14. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    No, it's just ignorance and her little power trip. Some people have so very LITTLE to have power over.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  15. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    So here's an update. I filed a complaint with the DOL - the guy I'm working with talked to their "legal council" and they informed him that the SPD states that the employee must work 40 hours in order to qualify for benefits. They said I must have received the document at some point with all my requests, but they would get him a copy and he could forward it to me. That was on Thursday - 9/10. I still have not received a copy of the document! If it does in fact state that it's 40 hours - what's the big deal? Give me a copy and I'll shut up! I told this guy that I have reason to believe that they are violating the plan then - because my boss's boss and the president of the company said they have had employees drop to 32 hours before and keep their benefits. Of course I have no way to prove this - is there a way to get the DOL to look into this? Also - in the meantime - I received my check on Friday - with hours deducted. They deducted 8 hours for a day I was sick since I have no sick time available - which I'm fine with. But they deducted 4 hours for my going to the doctor the day before - which i understand is not ok since I am an exempt employee. I then had to tell Ms. HR that they incorrectly deducted my check and it still isn't resolved! How long do they have to resolve that? Also - if they can give me an unpaid day for being sick and I still qualify for my benefits -- why can't I just take an unpaid leave day each Friday and qualify??? It doesn't make any sense to me....thanks in advance!

    Posted 2 months ago #
  16. littlelulu

    Super Moderator
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 2914

    It took my supervisor over a month to reimburse me my travel expenses for a training she sent me to. She INTENTIONALLY sat on it because SHE COULD. When I asked the union about it, they said there is no time frames to process travel reimbursement. In your case, since they shorted your paycheck, I would think they would make it up no later than your next paycheck. You could talk to the Dept of Labor about this as well.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  17. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Sure, the DOL would be most happy to investigate a complaint that the company has treated employees unequally with regard to its health benefit plan. If you have NAMES of employees to give the DOL, of course, that's best. If not, that's okay, because the DOL would just request copies of pay records from the company that show who got paid for how many hours each week and who's on the company's benefits plan. If they find people who are working less than 40 hours a week that are still on the benefits, but you've been dropped because you've supposedly dropped below 40 hours, the company's in some hot water with the DOL.

    If you're a salaried/exempt employee, the company's also buying themselves a WHOLE BUNCH OF grief with regard to your exempt status. They can't just be deducting hours here and there from your paycheck. An exempt employee gets paid X amount per week, no matter how many hours they work. They can work 5 hours, they get paid X; they can work 55 hours, they get paid the SAME X amount. It doesn't matter. The only way the company can deduct anything from your pay is in keeping with a bona fide written attendance policy - and you said they don't HAVE any written policies. The DOL doesn't like companies that mess with the Exempt / Non-Exempt split and they will HAPPILY come in and slap your Miss HR around. Of course, it will probably result in most, if not all, of the employees of your company being converted to Hourly, Non-Exempt status and being paid on an hourly basis. Which could be a good thing for some people if they've worked MORE than 40 hours in some weeks, because then the company will have to pay them overtime for past weeks. And the DOL can make it retroactive.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  18. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    The gentleman I talked with at the DOL didn't seem too interested in my claim that they were providing benefits to some employees and not others. He told me it was my word against theirs. I just spoke with some of the employees on the 3rd shift who are hourly - they work 30 hours and get benefits. They are supposed to be full-time but haven't received a full check in almost 3 years! Do you think there is someone else at the DOL I should talk to?

    Posted 2 months ago #
  19. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    bleeb,
    They haven't actually cut you off the benefits yet, have they? The DOL isn't going to investigate something that hasn't even happened yet - there's nothing to investigate. As long as they're treating everyone the same and insuring everyone no matter how many hours they work (30, 35, 40), they haven't broken any law. Wait until they actually CANCEL your benefits - THAT's when you'd have a real case against them. In the meantime, get those 3rd shift employees to give you written statements confirming what they told you. If they won't give you something in writing, at least get their full names, how long they've worked for the company, and how long they've worked 30 hours a week. Keep that info at home, because you'll need it as soon as your benefits get cancelled, when you file a complaint.

    In the meantime - what about my questions about your Exempt status? Are you sure you're Salaried Exempt? And they're deducting money from your paycheck for timem you missed? That's a waaayyy bigger issue.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  20. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    No they haven't cut me off yet - if I drop to 32 hours they will. I really can't afford to lose the benefits - I thought it was violating their plan if their plan says that the employees have to work 40 hours and they are offering it to some at 30+ hours but not all. Yes - I'm salaried exempt. I get $51k per year and am pd no overtime. I'm a computer analyst. They deducted 4 hours for a dr appt - and I did have a dr's note. Who do I go to about this??

    Posted 2 months ago #
  21. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Here's a link to the US Department of Labor's FairPay Fact Sheet on exemptions for computer professionals. Read it and see if you believe it applies to your job:

    http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/regs/compliance/fairpay/fs17e_computer.htm

    Here's a Fact Sheet on Exemptions that talks about what employers can and CAN'T do:

    http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/regs/compliance/fairpay/fs17g_salary.pdf

    Your state may have more stringent requirements, and if so, the state laws would take precedence over federal laws. So - depending on which law took precedence would decide to whom you make a complaint. Chances are, though, that you'll file a complaint with the US DOL, Wage and Hour Division. Before you do that, though, try to get names of other employees you know who've had pay deducted for similar situations. The DOL doesn't like to mess with single-employee complaints for a couple-hour deduction - they want to focus their resources on the big, repeat offenders. If you can't find anyone else this has happened to, I suggest you send your employer a letter saying:

    Dear Employer:
    As you know, I am a Salaried/Exempt employee under the FLSA. As such, I am to receive a set amount of compensation each pay period, and this amount cannot be reduced except under very limited circumstances, which you have not followed. Because the recent deduction from my paycheck was inappropriate and quite likely illegal, I am requesting that you correct this error immediately by providing me with the balance of pay that has been withheld from me. If I don't receive this corrected pay on my next paycheck, I will have no choice but to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor. In addition to my own pay records, I will suggest to the DOL that they audit other employees' records for similar illegal deductions.
    Sincerely,
    You

    Posted 2 months ago #
  22. bleeb

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 20

    Finally some action!! I asked the HR person 3 times about my check - with no acknowledgement what-so-ever! I copied your email and sent it off - within 3 minutes she responded that my balance due would be on my next check! Thanks so much for your help! I still have not received the eligibility documents that were requested by me or the DOL - they have 6 days left before the 30 days are up!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  23. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Congratulations - glad to hear it! Now just be prepared for a little retaliation from this chick - she won't be happy that you rubbed her nose in her screw-up. Retaliation for pointing out that they broke the law is illegal, though, too, so let us know if she does anything to retaliate. If you don't have the SPD within the next 6 days, we'll send them a letter on that, too.

    Your "HR" person needs an education in HR.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  24. msliberated

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 443

    OnYourSide you're the best!
    How about when an hourly employee reached an annual review gets a race after that but as an excuse management will choose to say(yous fall on the this quarterly batch) your annual raise will be in your check on xxxx date but in reality your anniversary let's say for example falls on the month 3 months prior to them finally giving you your annual performance review. From my understanding and from how it was done on my past employer-you will have a back pay/pro-rate from your actual anniversary date.
    My annual review/pay race was May, I didn't get my review till July-so I did not receive my pay raise until 2 pay period had passed. Isn't clearly robbing us! This happens every year! Please advice.......

    Posted 1 month ago #
  25. msliberated

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 443

    Just called the number given by DOL-in my state and tha person/deputy that answered the phone coudn't give me a straight/clear answer as to what the laws are on retro-pay/backpays on annual pay raises. All he could say and he kept repeating it to me is the fact that I have worked there and therefore I accepted the terms and condition. OF WHAT? WHERE CAN I FIND THESE TERMS AND CONDITION? OnYourSide I am more confused than ever. HELP!!!!!!

    Posted 1 month ago #
  26. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Well, that's a stupid answer. It's technically true, but it's stupid. What he SHOULD have said to make it clear is: "There are no federal or state laws that control how employers must handle annual pay raises, and therefore you're not protected unless you have a union or other contract." It means: You're at the mercy of your employer and you play by their rules, whether they're written or not. I suspect your employer doesn't HAVE any written rules on this subject, and even if they did they'd break them.

    Every company is different in how they handle pay increases. Some just give everyone an across-the-board "cost of living" increase once a year on a set date. For example, everyone gets a 3% increase on January 1st every year, and it doesn't matter what their performance was. Sometimes that's dictated by union contract.

    Others do all their performance reviews on the same date every year - for example, January 1st - and everyone gets their merit increases at the same time. One person might get 1%, another person might get 10% - it's based on how good their performance is. Since they obviously aren't going to be able to actually DO everyone's reviews right ON January 1st, they'll do them as close to that date as they can, and then adjust their pay afterward, giving them "retro" pay to bring their pay into line with what it should be.

    Still other companies do all their performance reviews on anniversary dates. For example, if you were hired June 17th, your performance review is due on June 17th every year, and if you get a raise, that's the date your raise is effective.

    But - as I said, there are no laws (I'm sure there are no FEDERAL laws; I'm pretty sure there are no STATE laws either, but it depends on what state you're in) that say your employer has to pay you retro pay if they don't do your review on time. Sucks, but it's within management's control. This is where a UNION would come in handy.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  27. msliberated

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 443

    You absolutely hit the wound "NO UNION" therefore they get away with all their illegal dealings and treatments with employees. I was hoping DOL have some law that will allow us to ask our employer with confidence as to why we are not given a retro-pay. It answered my question on why they deliberately delay on your annual reviews. Juat another tricky and corrupt way to save money-cheat on the lowly!!!!GRRRRRRRRR....

    Posted 1 month ago #
  28. msliberated

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 443

    OnYourSide on FMLA list of eligibility-it states 1250 hrs. in 12 months......does this means if you are a part time employee and short of 1250 hours within a year you will not be eligible for FMLA?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  29. OnYourSide

    Member
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 405

    Unfortunately, yes, that's what it means. There's no pro-rating.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  30. littlelulu

    Super Moderator
    Login to Send PM
    Post Count: 2914

    Thats TERRIFIC Bleeb!! Watch your back.........

    Posted 1 month ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.